Journal article
Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 110, 2026, p. 102968
Psychology Department
University of Alberta
APA
Click to copy
Carr, C. E. G., Propp, A., Saikaly, K. R., & Bailey, K. (2026). When science isn't beautiful: Lab aesthetics impact reaction times and reactive cognitive control. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 110, 102968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.102968
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
Carr, Chandler E. G., Audrey Propp, Kayla R Saikaly, and Kira Bailey. “When Science Isn't Beautiful: Lab Aesthetics Impact Reaction Times and Reactive Cognitive Control.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 110 (2026): 102968.
MLA
Click to copy
Carr, Chandler E. G., et al. “When Science Isn't Beautiful: Lab Aesthetics Impact Reaction Times and Reactive Cognitive Control.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 110, 2026, p. 102968, doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.102968.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{chandler2026a,
title = {When science isn't beautiful: Lab aesthetics impact reaction times and reactive cognitive control},
year = {2026},
journal = {Journal of Environmental Psychology},
pages = {102968},
volume = {110},
doi = {10.1016/j.jenvp.2026.102968},
author = {Carr, Chandler E. G. and Propp, Audrey and Saikaly, Kayla R and Bailey, Kira}
}
Aesthetic experiences are a universal and constant phenomenon, affecting our decision making, job performance, and emotional reactivity. While the effects of aesthetic experiences reach far beyond the simple appreciation of art, most research in the field still focuses on subjective ratings of fine art. The current study explored the effect of decorating a lab space, through the addition of a rug, faux plants, artwork, and nicer desk and chair, on a participant's inhibitory control and emotional reactivity. Study 1 used an online survey to confirm that participants found the aesthetic room (i.e., decorated lab space) more pleasing and comforting, and expressed a greater willingness to work in that space compared to the bare room. In Study 2, participants performed a Proportion Congruent Stroop task to examine inhibitory control and a Emotion Vocabulary Stroop task to test inhibitory control in the context of emotional stimuli, or their emotional reactivity. Average response times on both tasks were faster in the aesthetic room, while accuracy did not differ between the rooms. Additionally, the bare room may impact the use of reactive, but not proactive, cognitive control. These results suggest that the aesthetics of a lab space may impact the efficiency of inhibitory control and conflict resolution in laboratory tasks. This research provides a controlled and standardized attempt at understanding the role that aesthetics plays in our daily lives by elaborating on the understudied link between aesthetics and inhibitory control.